6. Sharing and Publishing OER
| π― Learning Outcomes | π Guiding Questions |
|---|---|
|
|
Your materials work for your training. Now the question shifts: can someone else use them?
There is a gap between materials that work for you and materials that work for others. You know your sequencing logic, the unstated context, the way an activity flows β but that knowledge is invisible to someone encountering your work for the first time. A facilitator browsing a repository needs to quickly understand what a resource is, who it is for, and how to use it. If those questions require detective work, they will move on.
This lesson is about closing that gap β through documentation, licensing, format choices, and platform decisions that make your work genuinely shareable.
Choosing a license for your materialsΒΆ
In Lesson 3, you learned how Creative Commons licenses work and what each condition (BY, SA, NC, ND) means. Now you need to choose one for your own materials. This is a design choice, not a legal formality β the license you pick shapes who can use your work and how far it can travel.
The decision comes down to one question: how open do you want to be?
For training materials, CC BY is usually the right choice. It allows anyone to reuse, adapt, and redistribute your work as long as they credit you β maximising reach with no barriers. If you want adaptations to remain open on the same terms, CC BY-SA achieves that. Adding NC (NonCommercial) or ND (NoDerivatives) restrictions significantly limits who can use your work; ND in particular undermines the core value of open training materials, since it prevents the localisation and adaptation that make resources genuinely useful.
When in doubt, choose CC BY
CC BY is the default for materials intended to have the widest possible impact. It removes barriers to reuse while still ensuring you receive credit.
One constraint to check: if you adapted materials from other sources, their licenses may limit your options. CC BY-SA source material, for example, requires your version to carry the same license. Review your source licenses before finalising your own.
Preparing materials for othersΒΆ
Checking readinessΒΆ
In Lesson 5, you applied the "stranger test" β writing materials that someone in a different context could follow without your help. Now apply that same lens one more time, specifically for sharing. Work through your materials and ask:
- Can someone follow the instructions without you in the room? Where would a new facilitator need to improvise or guess?
- Is the purpose of each component clear? Not just what to do, but why?
- Are prerequisites stated? What must learners know, have, or have completed beforehand?
- Is anything still in your head? Verbal context, on-the-fly adjustments, delivery notes β if it matters, write it down.
Ready enough is ready
The most common reason materials are never shared is waiting until they feel complete. They will not. Share when materials are clear enough to be useful, and plan to improve them based on how they are actually used. A first version with rough edges is more valuable than a polished version that never leaves your hard drive.
Adding documentationΒΆ
Documentation is the context that makes your materials usable by strangers. At minimum, include:
- Purpose and learning outcomes β what the materials are designed to achieve
- Intended audience β who the materials are for, including assumed background and skill level
- Instructions for use β how to use the materials, including sequencing, timing, and any preparation needed
- Assumptions and requirements β what tools, access, or prior knowledge is needed
- License and attribution β your chosen license and credits for any adapted materials
Place this documentation where users will find it. A README file in a repository, an introductory section in a document, or a metadata page on a platform all work. The key is that someone should not have to open and read every file to understand what the collection contains and how to use it.
Choosing formats and platformsΒΆ
Where and how you share materials affects who can access and use them. These are practical decisions, not afterthoughts.
Format for accessΒΆ
The format you choose determines whether others can actually adapt your work β not just read it.
Share in editable formats (Word, Markdown, Google Docs, LaTeX source). If you share only a PDF, you are technically allowing adaptation but practically making it very difficult. The accessibility principles from Lesson 5 β structured headings, alt text, clear language β also matter here, because they determine whether your materials work across devices, screen readers, and low-bandwidth settings.
PDF is not an open format
PDF is useful for final, fixed-layout documents, but it is not ideal as a primary sharing format for OER. It is difficult to edit and does not adapt well to different screen sizes. If you share a PDF, also provide an editable source file.
Platform for purposeΒΆ
Where you publish depends on who you want to reach and how you expect materials to be used.
Institutional repositories (your university's or organisation's open access platform) provide permanence and discoverability within academic systems. Good for materials you want to be citable.
Domain repositories like Zenodo provide DOIs (persistent identifiers) and are designed for research outputs including training materials. Useful when you want a citable, permanent reference.
Code and content platforms like GitHub support versioning, collaboration, and community contributions. Well-suited for materials that will evolve over time, especially technical training.
Open platforms like OER Commons are designed specifically for educational resources, with metadata fields that support discovery by other educators.
Your own website or blog gives you full control and immediate accessibility, but lacks the discoverability and permanence of repositories.
There is no single correct choice. You can publish in multiple places β a primary version on GitHub with a citable snapshot on Zenodo, for example. Choose based on where your intended audience is most likely to look.
Making materials findableΒΆ
Even well-prepared materials are useless if no one can find them. Help potential users discover your work:
- Clear, descriptive titles β "Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis: Workshop Materials for Community Health Researchers" is findable; "Module 3 Materials" is not
- Keywords and tags β use terms your audience would search for, including discipline, level, method, and format
- A clear summary β a 2β3 sentence description that tells someone what the materials are, who they are for, and what they cover
- Context for use β a note about the setting the materials were designed for, which helps others judge relevance
In practiceΒΆ
π Use Activity 14: OER Workflow β prepare your materials for sharing
Work through Section 4 (Prepare for Sharing). Document what you will share, in what format, with what license, on what platform, and with what documentation.
- what to do: Prepare at least one set of materials for sharing β add documentation, choose a license, select a format and platform, and ensure the materials can be used without your explanation
- focus sections: 4 (Prepare for Sharing)
- expected output: Materials ready to share, with documentation, license, and a plan for where and how to publish
- approximate time: 20β30 minutes
π Come back to Activity 9: Practice & Feedback Plan
- what to do: Identify where someone using your materials might need clarification or support. Use this to refine your documentation β if you can anticipate where a facilitator would struggle, address it in the materials rather than leaving it to chance.
- expected output: Refined documentation informed by anticipating how others will use your materials
- approximate time: 10β15 minutes
Before you move onΒΆ
You should now have:
- materials that can be used without your explanation
- a chosen license applied to your materials
- clear documentation (purpose, audience, instructions, assumptions, attribution)
- a decision about format and platform for sharing
- materials that are findable (clear title, keywords, summary)
In the next lesson, you will plan how to sustain and improve your materials over time as they are used in real contexts.
Further reading (optional)ΒΆ
-
UNESCO (2019) β Recommendation on Open Educational Resources β Supports: sharing, access, and platform strategies for OER β Why it matters: defines international principles for making resources widely available, including guidance on formats, platforms, and policies β Source: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer
-
Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2014) β Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources β Supports: discoverability and platform choice β Why it matters: examines what makes OER repositories effective, including metadata, quality indicators, and user experience β Source: https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2083