Bloom’s Taxonomy — Quick Guide for Writing Learning Outcomes¶
Bloom’s taxonomy helps you choose action verbs that describe what learners should be able to do.
Use it as a guide — not a checklist.
How to use this
- Start with what learners need to do in practice
- Then choose a verb that reflects that action
- Avoid vague verbs like understand, know, or learn unless you make them more specific
Bloom’s levels and example verbs¶
1. Remember¶
Use when learners need to recall information, terms, or basic facts.
Example verbs:
- define
- list
- identify
- name
- recall
- recognise
Example outcome:
Identify the main components of a system map.
2. Understand¶
Use when learners need to explain ideas, describe meaning, or make sense of concepts.
Example verbs:
- explain
- summarise
- interpret
- describe
- classify
- compare
Example outcome:
Explain the difference between outputs, outcomes, and impact.
3. Apply¶
Use when learners need to use knowledge, methods, or tools in a practical task.
Example verbs:
- use
- apply
- demonstrate
- implement
- complete
- carry out
Example outcome:
Apply backward design to structure a short training session.
4. Analyse¶
Use when learners need to examine relationships, identify patterns, or diagnose problems.
Example verbs:
- analyse
- distinguish
- examine
- diagnose
- differentiate
- investigate
Example outcome:
Analyse a training design to identify points of misalignment.
5. Evaluate¶
Use when learners need to make judgements based on criteria.
Example verbs:
- evaluate
- assess
- justify
- critique
- prioritise
- judge
Example outcome:
Evaluate whether a training activity provides meaningful evidence of learning.
6. Create¶
Use when learners need to produce, design, or adapt something new.
Example verbs:
- design
- create
- develop
- construct
- adapt
- produce
Example outcome:
Design a short training activity aligned with a learning outcome.
Important: You do NOT need to move through levels sequentially¶
Common misconception
Training does not need to progress step-by-step from remember → understand → apply → analyse → evaluate → create.
Choose the level that matches what learners actually need to do.
- You can design directly for apply, analyse, or create
- Not all training needs all levels
- Lower levels are not always a prerequisite for higher levels
For example:
- If learners need to use a tool, start at apply
- If learners need to diagnose issues, start at analyse
- If learners need to produce outputs, start at create
Practical guidance¶
Important
Higher Bloom’s levels are not automatically better.
Choose the level that matches what learners actually need to do in their real context.
For example:
- If learners need to follow a process correctly, apply may be enough
- If learners need to diagnose problems, analyse may be more appropriate
- If learners need to develop their own materials or plans, create may be appropriate
Avoid vague learning outcomes¶
Avoid outcomes such as:
- Understand climate data
- Know the principles of good training
- Learn about alignment
These do not make performance visible.
Make them more specific¶
Instead of:
- Understand climate data
Use:
- Interpret a local climate dataset to identify practical risks
Instead of:
- Learn about alignment
Use:
- Identify and correct misalignment between learning outcomes, activities, and assessment
Quick check for a strong learning outcome¶
A strong learning outcome is:
- observable
- action-oriented
- relevant to practice
- possible to assess
Reminder¶
Key principle
Choose verbs that match real-world performance.
The goal is not to sound academic. The goal is to make learning visible.
Further reading¶
-
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) — Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
→ Supports: original classification of learning objectives into levels of cognitive complexity
→ Why it matters: establishes the foundational framework for defining and structuring learning outcomes
→ Source: https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PPP242/Benjamin%20S.%20Bloom%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Educational%20Objectives%2C%20Handbook%201_%20Cognitive%20Domain-Addison%20Wesley%20Publishing%20Company%20%281956%29.pdf -
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) — A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview
→ Supports: explanation of the revised structure and its application to teaching, learning, and assessment
→ Why it matters: clarifies how the taxonomy connects learning objectives, activities, and assessment in practice
→ Source: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2